Fun quotes from the Johns Hopkins/WEF/Gates Foundation 2017 “SPARS Pandemic” planning document: untested, long-term side effects, and inferior to natural immunity edition.

Ann Barnhardt gets it!

https://www.barnhardt.biz

A reader sends. Remember, folks, this document was published in October ARSH 2017. They knew they would be forcing an INTENTIONALLY untested (because all Moderna trials for years on mRNA injections couldn’t get out of the animal trials phase because of the TOXICITY), toxic, and totally useless injection on the entire human race. The CoronaScam has been and continues to be a meticulously planned and executed human depopulation and control operation. Anyone who denies this is either an evil liar, a religious zealot (because Covidism is a religion, a thinly-veiled variant of Freemasonry/Satanism), or terminally stupid.

Read the ARSH 2016 Moderna piece HERE wherein the total failure of mRNA injections and their toxicity- especially when taken in multiple doses- is openly discussed, and wherein Moderna psychopath founder Bencel describes his business plan to copy the computer antivirus software subscription model with mRNA injections, required to upgrade and patch all human (and eventually animal) immune systems.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Ann,

Bottom p.43-44 “…anti-vaccine proponents began spreading the message that Corovax was inadequately tested and had unknown, long-term side effects and that natural immunity resulting from contracting the disease was a more effective means of conferring protection.“

What a coincidence! Whodda thunk it! Why, these people are downright PRESCIENT!

That they were aware, in 2017, of the likely reaction and behavior as this thing played out is sickening.

And it explains why the massive, almost complete blackout of ANY alternative information was immediate and ubiquitous across all media. They had anticipated what would happen when other medical experts not in on this spoke out.

Just imagine what information their post-‘pandemic’, “lessons learned” meetings are generating, at how to do this much better.

God bless.

Anonymous Reader

…………………………………………………………………………………………………….

I was actually shocked that Ann had not seen this “simulation” yet.

At least one popular substance writer who is also a physician told me he knew exactly what course the Covid “pandemic” would take because he had already researched this document.

—Edwin

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/

ACKNOWLEDGING LOSS

CHAPTER EIGHTEEN

At the request of HHS Secretary Nagel, ASPR convened a series of meetings among senior leadership of the federal health agencies to address policy and program changes being implemented as a result of a departmental review of the response to the SPARS pandemic. Among the issues considered were the implications of growing negative public opinion regarding Corovax and the government’s perceived indifference to victims of the public health response to SPARS. One senior health official argued that time and a robust medical monitoring program for vaccine recipients—the components of which were already in place—should be sufficient to determine whether public concern about long-term effects was, in fact, warranted: “We have to wait for the data. People need to understand that fact.”

One prominent attendee at these meetings was Dr. Ann Flynn, the director of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Staff from the administration’s Disaster Technical Assistance Center had recently briefed Dr. Flynn on usage data for the SAMHSA Disaster Distress Helpline over the past year, and summary reports indicated that a significant number of helpline users said that their principal worry was associated with the SPARS pandemic and, more recently, uncertainty about potential long-term effects of Corovax. Considering this new knowledge, Dr. Flynn countered the earlier claim that the public simply needed to wait until the science was clear: “Communities around the country went through what some felt was a harrowing public health emergency, only later to confront the possibility, however slim, that the medicine we promised wouldhelp them may in fact be hurting them.”

The senior leaders in attendance concluded, after much prompting by Dr. Flynn, that no top political or public health figurehead had publicly recognized the collective sense of vulnerability that the pandemic had elicited or the strength that the public exhibited under threat of grave danger. Moreover, no national leader had publicly acknowledged the public’s broad willingness to accept a prescribed countermeasure that promised to end the pandemic, but whose long-term consequences were not fully understood at the time.

Following the meeting, ASPR recommended to HHS Secretary Nagel that SAMHSA collaborate with stakeholders and devise behavioral health guidance for the states, tribes, and territories on how to strengthen the public’s coping skills, provide support for grieving individuals, encourage a forward direction, and meet other SPARS recovery needs. It was further recommended that Secretary Nagel consult with President Archer about the possibility of acknowledging the emotional toll of SPARS during a future public appearance. The primary message would be one of gratitude to the American people for remaining strong during the pandemic. Another key message would convey appreciation for adhering to public health recommendations, including vaccination, to hasten the end of the pandemic in the face of considerable uncertainty.

President Archer agreed to address the country’s resolve and recovery in the face of SPARS. Top risk communication advisors from the CDC, FDA, NIH, and SAMHSA conferred as a group about how best to frame the President’s remarks. The group vigorously debated whether it was appropriate for the President to acknowledge the sacrifice that vaccine recipients had made on behalf of their communities or to console them in their grief over that sacrifice.